There is also KeyOxide with solves part of it via cryptographic verification and I believe some fediverse platforms already support it: https://codeberg.org/keyoxide
poVoq
Admin on the slrpnk.net Lemmy instance.
He/Him or what ever you feel like.
XMPP: [email protected]
Avatar is an image of a baby octopus.
- 310 Posts
- 2.05K Comments
https://www.luanti.org/
Is much nicer 👍
poVoq@slrpnk.netto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What do Americans have to worry about that Canadians dont?4·8 days agoTo me it lately sounds like Canadians do need to worry a bit about “freedom” being brought to them.
poVoq@slrpnk.netto Solarpunk Urbanism@slrpnk.net•A few more recent photos of this Solar Punk masterpiece in Turin.English41·8 days agoWhat is this building used for?
But yes, looks pretty cool, just not very practical 😅
Sounds quite good, but just use regular Debian, ubuntu isn’t any better and annoying with their Snap BS.
I guess i need some kind of VPN for a secure use?
You can set up a Wireguard VPN.
poVoq@slrpnk.netMto Europe@feddit.org•Why spend more on defense in Western Europe?English5·13 days agoThe argument about possible threats is good, but why this means we need to increase defense spending is completely unexplained.
Europe already vastly outspends Russia on defense, and for example Spain buying more Leopard 2 tanks just to have them rot in their baracks is not helping at all.
We need to get more efficient in defense spending and we need to invest in defensive weapons that can be easily moved where they are actually needed. Better locally produced anti-air defense, especially ones cheap enough to work against drone swarms are probably also needed.
But none of that needs 5% of GDP. We could probably significantly reduce current defense spending and still end up with an more effective deterrent against Russia.
Our infrastructure and social services are already massively underfunded. More than doubling defense spending will come at a cost to those services, especially with right wing governments in power everywhere. And the result of that is just as much if not more of a threat to our values and the cohesion of the EU than Russia.
Well, if you have read it then your cherry picking of minor ways Bluesky is slighly less closed comes accross as pretty bad faith 🤷
Mining on earth is extremely destructive, but if human civilisation is to survive the coming challenges, it will still need a source of high value raw materials.
Getting them from the astroid belt and refining it in space all via robotic probes seems not so far fetched.
But once such an industry is established the economies of space travel change dramatically.
Sure, overall I agree with the article, but there will be most likely a few that will leverage the economies of scale mentioned above for some human exploration beyond the belt.
Because if you are at a certain age and healthy enough, you can plan a nice multi-year trip without “return ticket” pretty easily and neither low gravity or radiation are a serious issue either.
poVoq@slrpnk.netMto Europe@feddit.org•Europe's rearmament continues to lag far behind Russia, study warnsEnglish43·15 days agoRussia outspends the whole of EU in military built-up
This is blatantly false and it takes a lot of massaging the numbers to reach even parity in spending like the OP article claims (but it uses pre-war PPP figures, which is completely laughable).
Is military spending efficient in the EU? No. Do we spend too much on unreliable US made weapons? Yes!
But Russia is spending a tiny fraction of what the EU+UK does, and its troups are exhausted from a protracted war with Ukraine.
Maybe they will try to poke a sleeping bear to divide us further as a form of asymetric warfare, but in no way (other that nuclear) is Russia an existential threat to Europe right now.
This is just the age old cold war fearmongering back in action. Lots of profits to be made from that…
poVoq@slrpnk.netMto Europe@feddit.org•Macron says Europe must become 'space power' againEnglish2·16 days agoBefore SpaceX, Ariane Space was pretty dominant in the commercial sattelite launch market. But they completely botched the Ariane 6 design and are now likely still decade away from having a reusable first stage, which is required to remain competitive.
They can be lucky that SpaceX is wasting their resources on a reusable second stage, which will likely never be economical.
poVoq@slrpnk.netto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•wanderer v0.17.0 released — Federation support is hereEnglish4·17 days agoHmm, did Pocketbase add AP support, or how is this implemented behind the scenes?
poVoq@slrpnk.netto Opensource@programming.dev•Zulip’s next-gen mobile app, powered by Flutter, released this week2·18 days agoJudging by the screenshots there are better looking IRC apps, but fine 🤷
poVoq@slrpnk.netto MeanwhileOnGrad@sh.itjust.works•Head Lemmy dev, main lemmy.ml admin, dessalines on the "DPRK is actually Good!" bent againEnglish7·19 days agoThe one in the OP afaik in
Canadathe imperial core 😏
poVoq@slrpnk.netMto Green Energy@slrpnk.net•A large solar plant in California is closing – what does it mean for solar power?9·20 days agoIf I remember correctly this was a scam anyways as it needed a lot of natural gas to pre-heat the central tower in the morning or so. So on less sunny days it was net-negative energy wise. But I might remember wrong.
poVoq@slrpnk.netto Space@beehaw.org•Is Gravity Just Entropy Rising? Long-Shot Idea Gets Another Look. | Quanta Magazine4·20 days agoThis is an interesting theory, but I think it is wrong that it assumes that there is some sort of evenly distributed universal qbit substrate.
The vital question is IMHO how can this theory fit in time dilation (= gravity lensing? ), which is an obversable fact near gravity wells or at high speeds.
I find it more likely that it will turn out that even time is somehow a function of this extended concept of entropy. Like as if mass, movement (~heat) and time are three facets of the same entropic force that has an upper limit that we currently only know for movement, i.e. the speed of light.
So something moving at the speed of light must have no mass and time stands practically still for it (as the case for photons), and the more mass something has the more time slows down around it (which can be observed) and gravity is the result of entropic movement being restricted.
Under such a theory, the observable effect of mass, i.e. gravity, is basically atoms being restricted in movement and thus over time sticking together similar to particles moving around in a liquid by diffusion but some part of it is more viscous and that over time accumulates all the particles due to the sticky effect.
A star would be then a place where mass and heat/movement is high, but time is slow, and a back hole would be an extreme case that is almost entirely mass, with no movement or time possible (hence nothing can escape from it).
poVoq@slrpnk.netto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Do instances exist where you can be 13+?English6·20 days agoI think you should find a smaller, well moderated instance and show it to your parents first. If they consent with her signing up to it, it should be fine and generally speaking there is no practical way for instances to check the age of their members anyways.
poVoq@slrpnk.netto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Threads is adding fediverse content to your social feedsEnglish61·20 days agoTumblr is being reworked to have a Wordpress backend right now, and Wordpress already has well working ActivityPub support, so yes, Tumblr will very likely happen once they made the switch.
I suspect the technical debt in Tumblr was larger than expected when the first announce federation support, and now it became nearly a full rewrite, which takes time.
poVoq@slrpnk.netto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Threads is adding fediverse content to your social feedsEnglish4·20 days agoThe most they can do is add a load of more users to the fediverse then take them away again. For them to successfully EEE the fediverse, it would require convincing existing fediverse users to switch to threads. I cannot see that happening on here on any noticeable scale.
Na, they were quite explicit what their plan is: they realized that there are interesting “content creators” on the fediverse, and that many other “content creators” are eying the fediverse and similar platforms as a way to have more control over the platform they use. And ultimately users will follow the creators, once the creators are sufficiently fed up with being taken hostage by facebook etc. So they are willing to let the creators switch to the fediverse, but want to retain the users as ultimatly that is where their revenue is coming from via advertisement and data harvesting.
Yeah, people complain about some Windows games not working, but it easily blows any console out of the water.